<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cybersteward.net &#187; NLRB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybersteward.net/topics/nlrb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybersteward.net</link>
	<description>rank-and-file union views since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wackenhut: Wacky Name, but They&#8217;re Even Worse on Labor Relations</title>
		<link>http://cybersteward.net/2008/05/20/wackenhut-wacky-name-but-theyre-even-worse-on-labor-relations/</link>
		<comments>http://cybersteward.net/2008/05/20/wackenhut-wacky-name-but-theyre-even-worse-on-labor-relations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[exposing anti-union propoganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solidarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep Chaka Fattah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep Patrick Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybersteward.net/2008/05/20/wackenhut-wacky-name-but-theyre-even-worse-on-labor-relations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our brothers over in the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) are waging an organizing campaign at Wackenhut Security, the firm that furnishes security services at National Parks and monuments like the Liberty Bell. Incidentally, the Liberty Bell is where two Philadelphia area congressmen, Chaka Fattah and Patrick Murphy (my congressman), rallied with Wackenhut workers and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our brothers over in the <a href="http://seiu.org/" target="_blank">Service Employees International Union (SEIU)</a> are waging an organizing campaign at Wackenhut Security, the firm that furnishes security services at National Parks and monuments like the Liberty Bell. </p>
<p>Incidentally, the Liberty Bell is where two Philadelphia area congressmen, Chaka Fattah and Patrick Murphy (my congressman), rallied with Wackenhut workers and SEIU organizers to launch the <a href="http://www.eyeonwackenhut.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&#038;SEC={0F3EE4AA-5250-435C-8FC2-C91714476ED4}" target="_blank">Wackenhut Workers Organizing Committee</a>.</p>
<p>Read the story from the <em>Philadelphia Daily News</em> <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/19092089.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Learn more about what&#8217;s going on with the organizing effort at the SEIU&#8217;s <a href="http://www.eyeonwackenhut.org/index.asp?Type=NONE&#038;SEC={6602E26B-93D3-4120-9085-0460E1F71E81}" target="_blank"><em>Eye on Wackenhut</em> website</a>.</p>
<hr /><small>Copyright &copy; 2008 Cybersteward.net<br /> This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. <br /> The use of this feed on other websites without express consent from the copyright holder breaches copyright. <br>(Digital Fingerprint:&nbsp; h2cs6895 (38.107.179.211) )</small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cybersteward.net/2008/05/20/wackenhut-wacky-name-but-theyre-even-worse-on-labor-relations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eye on the NLRB</title>
		<link>http://cybersteward.net/2007/12/12/eye-on-the-nlrb/</link>
		<comments>http://cybersteward.net/2007/12/12/eye-on-the-nlrb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybersteward.net/2007/12/12/eye-on-the-nlrb/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American Rights at Work is offering a new blog for those (like me) who are interested in keeping an eye on the NLRB. Copyright &#169; 2008 Cybersteward.net This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. The use of this feed on other websites without express consent from the copyright holder breaches copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:&#160; h2cs6895 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/" target="_blank">American Rights at Work</a> is offering a new blog for those (like me) who are interested in keeping an <a href="http://eyeonthenlrb.org/" target="_blank">eye on the NLRB</a>.</p>
<hr /><small>Copyright &copy; 2008 Cybersteward.net<br /> This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. <br /> The use of this feed on other websites without express consent from the copyright holder breaches copyright. <br>(Digital Fingerprint:&nbsp; h2cs6895 (38.107.179.211) )</small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cybersteward.net/2007/12/12/eye-on-the-nlrb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Reason We Need the EFCA</title>
		<link>http://cybersteward.net/2007/10/06/another-reason-we-need-the-efca/</link>
		<comments>http://cybersteward.net/2007/10/06/another-reason-we-need-the-efca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unionism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybersteward.net/2007/10/06/another-reason-we-need-the-efca/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the NLRB continues to drop the ball, like in their new decision to deny access to widely-used voluntary card check recognition. From the summation provided by American Rights at Work: More and more workers seek alternatives to organizing through the lengthy, conflict-ridden NLRB election process. When unions and employers can come together to agree [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the NLRB continues to drop the ball, like in their new decision to deny access to widely-used voluntary card check recognition. From <a href="http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/workersrights/eye10_2007.cfm" target="_blank">the summation provided by American Rights at Work</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>More and more workers seek alternatives to organizing through the lengthy, conflict-ridden NLRB election process.  When unions and employers can come together to agree on a peaceful process of organizing, the Board should promote this progress in labor relations.  Instead, the Board turned on its own mission to promote collective bargaining, and is aiding the right-wing attack on the freedom of association.  This ruling further underscores the need for Congress to pass the Employee Free Choice Act, which would allow workers to more freely form unions.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/takeaction/efca/resources.cfm" target="_blank">Click here</a> for more on the Employee Free Choice Act.</p>
<hr /><small>Copyright &copy; 2008 Cybersteward.net<br /> This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. <br /> The use of this feed on other websites without express consent from the copyright holder breaches copyright. <br>(Digital Fingerprint:&nbsp; h2cs6895 (38.107.179.211) )</small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cybersteward.net/2007/10/06/another-reason-we-need-the-efca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Does &#8216;Kentucky River&#8217; Have to Do with Me?</title>
		<link>http://cybersteward.net/2006/10/05/what-does-a-case-called-kentucky-river-have-to-do-with-pennsylvania/</link>
		<comments>http://cybersteward.net/2006/10/05/what-does-a-case-called-kentucky-river-have-to-do-with-pennsylvania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybersteward.net/2006/10/05/what-does-a-case-called-kentucky-river-have-to-do-with-pennsylvania/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The result could come as a rude shock to nurses and other workers who for decades have been effectively protected by the NLRA, but who now may find themselves treated, for labor-law purposes, as members of management, with no right to pursue collective bargaining or engage in other concerted activity in the workplace.. ..The majority’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;The result could come as a rude shock to nurses and other workers who for decades have been effectively protected by the NLRA, but who now may find themselves treated, for labor-law purposes, as members of management, with no right to pursue collective bargaining or engage in other concerted activity in the workplace.. ..The majority’s decision thus denies the protection of the Act to yet another group of workers, while strengthening the ability of employers to resist the unionization of other employees.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And that&#8217;s just from the two dissenting members of Bush&#8217;s NLRB on the recent &#8220;Kentucky River&#8221; decision. If you don&#8217;t like the sound of this, you can <a href="http://action.americanrightsatwork.org/campaign/kyriverbush/nqz7x77tt?" target="_blank">click here to tell President Bush</a>. If you think it&#8217;s no big deal, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/04/washington/04labor.html?&#038;pagewanted=print" target="_blank">read more from the <em>New York Times</em></a>.</p>
<hr /><small>Copyright &copy; 2008 Cybersteward.net<br /> This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. <br /> The use of this feed on other websites without express consent from the copyright holder breaches copyright. <br>(Digital Fingerprint:&nbsp; h2cs6895 (38.107.179.211) )</small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cybersteward.net/2006/10/05/what-does-a-case-called-kentucky-river-have-to-do-with-pennsylvania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

